17 Dec

Education kills Creativity


The school system is rigid and, therefore, does not give room for innovative thinkers. Most time of the time in school is allocated to subjects like sciences and mathematics. Most schools are always willing to fund initiatives in mathematics in sciences and mathematics, and to some extent, humanities, but most arts go underfunded. Schools teach students how to perfect their ability to duplicate what is taught in class in their exam papers rather than give them a chance to understand and come up with new ideas. Ken Robinson, in his video about creativity suggests that to improve creativity among students, teachers should focus on individual capacities and talents.

School education emphasizes on the knowledge of things that are already known, and an attempt to move from such knowledge guarantees failure. Students attend school to learn systematic things, doing homework, exams. It does not give a platform for growth in unique ways. There are guidelines for all students, and a little diversion leads to punishment or being considered a failure. Schools promote the notion that students who pass and get good grades are bound to be successful in life. This notion discourages those willing to take up creative careers like acting. The rate at which students are graduating in courses they are less passionate about are increasing is alarming. Students lose themselves in books forgetting that they will also need creative minds to make it much later in life.

The school system is redundant in its output. The aim of every school is to equip children with information and at the end of it give back the society an all round person. However, in more cases, the school does not grow or improve the creativity of the child. Although mathematics and English are important, creativity is vital and should be encouraged by incorporating subjects like music and creative arts into the curriculum, or given the same attention as other subjects since they will help students turn new ideas into reality. Not all students want to be doctors and lawyers when they grow up. Some want to be musicians, entrepreneurs or actors and, therefore, need subjects that will improve their ability to perceive new world ways (Batten Institute).

The school system punishes those who can think differently. It gives a notion that, students who are less passionate about the conventionally prioritized subjects are either dumb or have a learning disorder. The system fails to recognize the possibility that people have different abilities that could have heavy influence in the arts fields. True creativity comes from within, as Sir Ken Robinson states. He cites the case of Gillian Lynn, who had been recommended for treatment for alleged learning disorder. Were it not for the psychiatrist who thought differently, the multi-millionaire would have been condemned to a mental asylum; as if being punished for thinking and being different (Robinson).

It is true that schools kill creativity, based on the points given above. The current school education is based upon the needs of the industrial era, which needed to churn out more industrial workers than those in the creative industries. However, the world has moved a century forward, yet the education structure remains the same you can read about these essays on creativity. The world in this age is more advanced in the physical and industrial capacities, and creativity is beginning to take a larger priority. The same curricula structured over a century ago can hardly care for today’s needs. Therefore, a curriculum change is required, one which emphasizes on all subjects, as it should be.